In the world of cybersecurity, organisations often rely on both manual penetration testing and automated vulnerability scans to identify and mitigate security risks. While automated scans can be useful in identifying low-hanging fruit vulnerabilities, manual penetration testing offers several benefits that cannot be replicated by automated tools. In this blog post, we will explore the advantages of manual penetration testing over automated scans.
Manual penetration testing provides an opportunity to tailor the testing process to the specific needs of the organisation. Penetration testers can focus on critical areas of the network or application, identify potential attack vectors, and create a customised testing plan. This approach allows for a more thorough examination of the system and a greater likelihood of identifying previously undiscovered vulnerabilities.
Manual penetration testing offers a deeper understanding of the system being tested. While automated scans can identify known vulnerabilities, they often lack the ability to understand the context in which those vulnerabilities exist. A skilled penetration tester can identify complex attack scenarios, determine the potential impact of an exploit, and provide valuable insights that an automated tool cannot.
Automated scans are limited in their ability to simulate real-world attack scenarios. Manual penetration testing, on the other hand, provides a more realistic simulation of an attacker attempting to exploit vulnerabilities in the system. This approach allows organisations to better understand their overall security posture and to identify areas for improvement.
Identification of 0-day vulnerabilities
Automated vulnerability scans rely on known vulnerabilities to identify security risks. However, in some cases, an attacker may discover a previously unknown vulnerability (often referred to as a 0-day vulnerability) and exploit it before a patch is available. Manual penetration testing can identify these types of vulnerabilities, allowing organisations to proactively address them before they can be exploited by an attacker.
One of the most significant advantages of manual penetration testing is the human element. A skilled penetration tester can provide valuable insights into the overall security posture of an organisation, identify potential security gaps, and provide actionable recommendations to improve security. This level of human insight cannot be replicated by automated tools.
In conclusion, while automated vulnerability scans can be a useful tool for identifying low-hanging fruit vulnerabilities, manual penetration testing offers several benefits that cannot be replicated by automated tools. These benefits include tailored testing, a deeper understanding of the system being tested, real-world simulation, identification of 0-day vulnerabilities, and human insight. Therefore, it is important for organisations to consider incorporating manual penetration testing into their overall security strategy to ensure a comprehensive and effective approach to cybersecurity.
If your organisation would like help with security testing networks and web applications and identifying hidden flaws in your existing security controls, please feel free to contact us to discuss the possibilities https://krypsys.com/contact-us/